Religious Government's Responsibility to Protect Citizens' Ideological Boundaries on the Syberspace (From the Perspective of Jurisprudence and Rights)

Document Type: Takhasosi


1 Assistant Professor of Islamic Jurisprudence/ Islamic Azad University (Najaf Abad Branch)

2 Doctor of Islamic Jurisprudence in Islamic Azad University (Najaf Abad Branch)/ Professor of Al-Mustafa Open University



The responsibility of a religious government in cyberspace can be divided into two parts: measures related to economic development and scientific, spiritual and ethical development; The Virtual Development and High Council holds the government responsible for developing measures to expand e-government and e-commerce, as well as defending, defending against hackers and cyberattacks; There is a common view among thinkers and they all emphasize the need to develop cyberspace in these areas. have.
What is at stake for some is the second part - the necessity of government responsibility in the spiritual and ethical spheres and the Islamic sciences; according to Islamic rule, one of its primary duties is to promote religious principles and to safeguard and protect them. There are various ways to do this; however, some still question whether protecting ideological boundaries is an inherent duty of government, which raises the question: Does Islamic jurisprudence and Islamic law have a duty to protect and protect citizens' ideological boundaries in cyberspace?
Accordingly, the hypothesis of this study is that: According to the philosophy of religious rule formation and jurisprudential arguments - the well-known and prohibited denial, the necessity of education, the jurisprudence of jurisprudence - as well as the principles contained in the laws of Iran, one of the The duties of the religious government are to protect and protect the ideological boundaries, one of which is to protect and protect cyberspace to prevent harming citizens' beliefs as a negative task - such as filtering - and to promote and promote religious beliefs in cyberspace. The task is positive.
To prove this hypothesis, a descriptive-analytical method has been used in the present study.


Main Subjects

  1. قرآن کریم.
  2. نهج البلاغه.
  3. تارنمای مقام معظم رهبری.
  4. امیر ارجمند، اردشیر (1381). م‍ج‍م‍وع‍ه‌ اس‍ن‍اد ب‍ی‍ن­ ال‍م‍ل‍ل‍ی‌ ح‍ق‍وق‌ ب‍ش‍ر. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
  5. تمیمی آمدی، عبدالواحد بن محمد (1360). غرر الحکم ودرر الکلم. شرح جمال­ الدین خوانساری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
  6. حسینی خامنه ­ای، سید علی (1377). آزادى از نظر اسلام و غرب. پژوهش ­های اجتماعی اسلامی (اندیشه حوزه سابق). شماره‏14: 41-13.
  7. قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
  8. قانون مجازات اسلامی.
  9. قرائتى، محسن (1383). تفسیر نور. تهران: مرکز فرهنگى درس ­هایى از قرآن‏.
  10. کاپلستون، فردریک چارلز (1393). تاریخ فلسفه: یونان و روم. ترجمه سید جلال­ الدین مجتبوی. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
  11. نیازی، احمدعلی (1389). اهداف و وظایف حکومت دینی. معرفت سیاسی. سال2. شماره 1: 179-149.
  12. واعظی، احمد (1383). حکومت اسلامی: درسنامه اندیشه سیاسی اسلام. قم: مرکز مدیریت حوزه علمیه قم.
  13. هاشمی، حسین (1384). ارتداد و آزادی. تهران: انتشارات پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی.