Double Blind Peer Review
Author(s) identity is removed from the manuscript and shielded from the reviewers during the review process. The reviewer is left with only the manuscript, without any information that might enable him/her uncovers the identity of the author(s). Information removed includes the author(s) name, address/affiliation, country, phone and email. Any information in the Acknowledgement and Declaration of Conflict of Interest that may lead to the uncovering of the identity of the author is also removed from the manuscript prior to sending it to reviewers.
Manuscripts are assigned to members of the editorial board of the journal or other qualified reviewers. The review process is done using the Manuscript Management System. Reviewers make one of the following recommendations:
•    Accept Unconditionally. Accept, with or without editorial revisions.
•    Accept Conditionally. Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached.
•    Reject in Current Form. Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a re-submission.
•    Reject Outright. Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems.
A Review Certificate is issued to reviewers after the review of the manuscript.

Flow Diagram Evaluation

The process of evaluation and accepting articles in IMJPL is in accordance with the following 15-step chart, and all journal processes from submitting an article to announcing the result of evaluation and announcing the Editor-in-Chief final opinion on publishing or rejecting an article are done through the journal system: