Document Type : REVIEW PAPER

Author

PhD Student in Department of Women's Studies, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

025/p-l.2017.340

Abstract

Compared to traditional media, an important characteristic of modern media is that it taps on electric and electronic means and it has extensive coverage. The most important characteristic of traditional media is that it creates a face-to-face communication between addresser and addressees. Modern media has its roots in modernism and is a direct consequence of modern societies. Modern media especially visual media represent the dominant values in the society and has altered the function of family toward more individualism, and individual behavioral patterns. Under the influence of modern media, families are losing their traditional function and are experiencing new functions. A function geared toward more individualism and catering for the individual needs of family members, a function that challenged the traditional dominant values of the family. Among all the contributing factors, modern media in their various forms and comprehensive advertisements, have played a pivotal role in internalizing characteristics of modern world and specially individualism among family members. The current study aims to investigate the new functions of family in accordance with the role played by visual media in the modern society.

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Bandora, A., (1973), Agression: A Social Learning Analysis, Englewood Glifs, N.J. Prentice Hall.
  2.  Clein, J., Screening Women and Elderly Adults for Family and Intermate Partner Violence, Journal of clinical guide lines, 140 (5): 2004.
  3. Dobash, R. E., (1979), Violence Against Wives, New York: The Free Press.
  4. Gerbner, George., (1994), Growing up with Television: The Cultivation Perspective, Inj, Media Effects in Theory and Research.
  5. Gorman, Smith., (1998), The Relation of Community and Family, Hillsdal, N. J. Eribaum.
  6. Pagani, L., The Impact of Family Transition on the Development of Delinuquency, Child Psychiatry, 39 (4): 1998.
  7. Reiner, R., (2000), The Politics of the Police, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Rock, Paul, (1996), Deviance, In Kuper, Adam and Jessica Kuper (eds), The Social Science Encyclopedia, (2nd ed), New York: Rutledge.
  9. Siegel. L. J., (2003), Criminology, Belmont. C. A. Wadsworth.
  10.  Stark, R., (1996), Religion, Deviance and Social Control, New York: Routledge.
  11.  Thompson, William E., Jacke E. Bynum., (1991), Juvenile Delinquency, Classic and Contemporary Reading, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  12.  Weist, Mark., Self-Reported Delinquent Behavior, A Brief Report, Child and Human Development, 28 (4): 1998.