Document Type : Paper Derived from Thesis

Authors

1 Department of Human Resource Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Organizational Behavior Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

SUBJECT & OBJECTIVES: The concept of pure living represents a core yet insufficiently theorized element of Afghan indigenous governance thought. Drawing on three interconnected traditions, this study develops a five-dimensional framework of pure living comprising moral integrity, social harmony, environmental stewardship, spiritual authenticity, and intergenerational accountability. The analysis explicitly treats indigenous institutions as internally heterogeneous rather than uniformly beneficial, examining their exclusionary, gender-discriminatory, and conflict-generating dimensions alongside their integrative functions. Despite significant political and institutional transformations across eight governmental periods, indigenous governance institutions, including the Jirga (council), Pashtunwali (Pashtun tribal code), Ulema (scholars) networks, and Ashar (communal cooperation), have demonstrated remarkable resilience. The study examines the conditions under which these institutions have either supported or undermined pure living and human dignity, and identifies which components of which institutions are most closely associated with each outcome.
METHOD & FINDING: Using a qualitative comparative-historical approach, the research combines process tracing, comparative analysis, critical juncture assessment, qualitative content analysis, and thematic coding. Evidence was triangulated from official documents, 28 semi-structured interviews, and authoritative secondary sources. Analysis revealed six indigenous values consistently linked to pure living—consensual decision-making through Jirga, the Pashtunwali principles of hospitality and sanctuary, communal solidarity, moderate Ulema authority, environmental stewardship, and intergenerational knowledge transmission—and, concurrently, identified specific components of the same institutions (ethnically bounded Pashtunwali authority, Badal , Namus) that have functioned as mechanisms of exclusion, retaliatory violence, and gender subordination. These values proved most effective during periods of constructive, safeguarded cooperation between state and indigenous institutions, particularly under the Zahir Shah administration and the National Solidarity Program during the Karzai era.
CONCLUSION: Indigenous values remain active governance resources whose effects on legitimacy, social cohesion, and human dignity are conditional rather than uniform: the same institutions that sustained cooperation and welfare provision have also been used to justify ethnic hierarchy, gender subordination, and cycles of retaliatory violence. The quality and safeguarding of interaction between formal administrative systems and indigenous institutions emerges as the strongest predictor of governance performance across all periods. To promote sustainable governance, the study proposes a four-tier Hybrid Public Service Model based on institutional recognition, procedural integration, value codification, and explicit safeguards against the exclusionary uses of the same institutions. It also establishes pure living as a legitimate, but internally contested, criterion for evaluating governance quality alongside conventional administrative measures.

Keywords

Main Subjects

OPEN ACCESS

©2026 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

 

Amnesty International. (1983). Afghanistan: Reports of Torture. Amnesty International.
Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU). (2007). State-Building, security, and the rule of law in Afghanistan. Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit..
Barfield, T. (2010). Afghanistan: A Cultural and Political History. Princeton University Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A Realist Theory of Science. Leeds Books.
Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341-369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852
Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service (4th ed.). Routledge.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill.
Dupree, L. (1980). Afghanistan (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Edwards, D. B. (2002). Before Taliban: Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad. University of California Press.
Ghani, A., & Lockhart, C. (2008). Fixing Failed States. A Framework for Rebuilding a Fractured World. Oxford.
Giustozzi, A. (2000). War, Politics and Society in Afghanistan, 1978-1992. Hurst.
Giustozzi, A. (2007). Koran, Kalashnikov, and laptop: The Neo-Taliban Insurgency in Afghanistan. Hurst.
Gregorian, V. (1969). The Emergence of Modern Afghanistan. Stanford University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2022). Afghanistan: Taliban Commit Massacres, Atrocities. Human Rights Watch.
Lange, M. (2013). Comparative-Historical Methods. SAGE Publications.
Mahoney, J. (2000). Path Dependence In Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
Mahoney, J. (2004). Comparative-Historical Methodology. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 81-101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110507
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. John W. Parker.
Nateghi, H., & Shah-Naqavi, D. S. A. S. (2022). Philosophy of Pilgrimage of the Holy Prophets and Infallible People and its Effect on Giving Meaning to Human life. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Pure Life (IMJPL), 9(30), 91–117. https://doi.org/10.22034/imjpl.2022.6795
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press.
Rashid, A. (2000). Taliban: Militant Islam, oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. Yale University Press.
Riggs, F. W. (1964). Administration in Developing Countries: The Theory of Prismatic Society. Houghton Mifflin.
Roy, O. (1986). Islam and Resistance in Afghanistan. Cambridge University Press.
Roy, O. (1995). Afghanistan: From Holy War to Civil War. Darwin Press.
Rubin, B. R. (1995). The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System. Yale University Press.
Shahrani, M. N. (2002). War, factionalism, and the state in Afghanistan. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 715–722. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.3.715
Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction. (2021). What We Need to Learn: Lessons From Twenty Years of Afghanistan Reconstruction. U.S. Congress.
United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan. (2022). Annual Report: Protection of Civilians in Afghanistan. United Nations.
Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to Methods For Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.
World Bank. (2005). Afghanistan: State Building, Sustaining Growth, and Reducing Poverty. World Bank.